Provide increased potential of curative graft versus tumor effect to your patients

alloHSCT has a demonstrated efficacy profile that improves overall survival for patients with AML and MDS. A population-based cohort study compared the outcomes of alloHSCT versus chemotherapy in first complete remission1

icon-people
Adults aged 15 to 70 with AML
icon-calendar
Diagnosed between 2000 and 2014 in Denmark
The median overall survival was 1173 days (~3 years, 3 months) for patients treated with alloHSCT compared to 476 days (~1 year, 3 months) in patients treated with chemotherapy alone1
grafapex-flower
Relapse risk was lowered by 55% in patients who were treated with alloHSCT versus chemotherapy alone1
grafapex-flower

Optimizing alloHSCT outcomes requires striking a balance between efficacy and treatment-related tolerability

There is a need toward reduced toxicity conditioning (RTC) to minimize toxicities while maintaining myeloblative properties.2 With the introduction of conditioning regimens with lowered toxicity risks, more patients may be eligible for alloHSCT. Personalizing the alloHSCT conditioning regimen is a critical task, as it can impact outcomes, including survival.3

Goals of alloHSCT conditioning include3:

Icons showing the goals of allo-HSCT conditioning: maximizing antileukemic activity, providing durable engraftment, and minimizing toxicity-related effects.
GRAFAPEX enables you to strike the right balance for patients with AML and MDS undergoing alloHSCT2
grafapex-flower
GRAFAPEX enables you to strike the right balance for patients with AML and MDS undergoing alloHSCT2
grafapex-flower

alloHSCT, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome.